Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science?
Jens Bennedsen, Michael E. Caspersen
Zu finden in: ICER 2008 (Seite 15 bis 26), 2008
Computing scientists generally agree that abstract thinking is a crucial component for practicing computer science.
We report on a three-year longitudinal study to confirm the hypothesis that general abstraction ability has a positive impact on performance in computing science.
Abstraction ability is operationalized as stages of cognitive development for which validated tests exist. Performance in computing science is operationalized as grade in the final assessment of ten courses of a bachelor's degree programme in computing science. The validity of the operationalizations is discussed.
We have investigated the positive impact overall, for two groupings of courses (a content-based grouping and a grouping based on SOLO levels of the courses' intended learning outcome), and for each individual course.
Surprisingly, our study shows that there is hardly any correlation between stage of cognitive development (abstraction ability) and final grades in standard CS courses, neither for the various group-ings, nor for the individual courses. Possible explanations are discussed.
Dieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt ...
Dieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt vermutlich nicht ...
- ICER 2009 - Proceedings of the Fifth International Workshop on Computing Education Research, ICER 2009, Berkeley, CA, USA, August 10-11, 2009 (Michael J. Clancy, Michael E. Caspersen, Raymond Lister) (2009)
- Neo-Piagetian Theory and the Novice Programmer (Donna Teague) (2015)
Volltext dieses Dokuments
|Abstraction ability as an indicator of success for learning computing science?: Fulltext at the ACM Digital Library (: , 296 kByte; : Link unterbrochen? Letzte Überprüfung: 2020-02-28 Letzte erfolgreiche Überprüfung: 2020-01-28)|