Going to Extremes
How Like Minds Unite and Divide
It is attractive, perhaps, that commentators are able to understand why the creation of groups of like-minded people, created to make decisions, such as committees of government, or panels of federal court judges, can lead to extremity rather than moderation. It is interesting to see that there are social forces that can lead to extremism and we need not always assume some characteristic of the people, their personality or their pathology, leads to extremity. This is a service performed by this book. But it may be a message that now itself needs moderation.
There is evidence becoming available that suggests that the formation of groups of people who form groups with different compositions, among such differences being variations in the average extremity of the opinions held, can lead not to polarization but rather to moderation. These studies are not done with college students or with ideologically extreme individuals, as has been the case with the bulk of the evidence presented by Sunstein. They are carried out with a range of voters across the political spectrum, everyday people leading everyday lives.
So, we must be wary of the evidence. The message of the book is that like-mindedness can lead to polarization of belief. That, as something which makes us question fundamental beliefs about personality and about the power of groups, is important. But the book also perhaps is speaking to the same kind of audience; we read what we like and already believe and we are reinforced in our beliefs and are led to a greater degree of extremity. We also need to read and to be exposed to evidence that is contrary to what we think or what we want to believe. Challenge can lead to moderation. In these times of increasing extremity of opinions about matters of the causes and effects of climate change, of changes in health care policy, on decisions about troop commitments etc, information that can affect the character of debate that can moderate rather than polarize would be better.
Dieses Buch erwähnt ...
KB IB clear
|Cass R. Sunstein|
KB IB clear
|Gruppenpolarization fördert Terrorismus|
KB IB clear
|9/11, Demokratiedemocracy, Denkenthinking, Epistemologie (Erkenntnistheorie)epistemology, Extremismus, Gesellschaftsociety, Gruppendynamikgroup dynamics, Gruppenpolarisation, Informationinformation, Klimawandel, Politikpolitics, Psychologiepsychology, Recht, Terrorismusterrorism, Theorietheory, urban legendsurban legends, USA|
Volltext dieses Dokuments
Beat und dieses Buch
Beat hat dieses Buch erst in den letzten 6 Monaten in Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. (das er aber aus Urheberrechtsgründen nicht einfach weitergeben darf). Es gibt bisher nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.