The participatory web in the context of academic researchLandscapes of change and conflicts
|
Diese Seite wurde seit 2 Jahren inhaltlich nicht mehr aktualisiert.
Unter Umständen ist sie nicht mehr aktuell.
Zusammenfassungen
This thesis presents the results of a narrative inquiry study conducted in the context of Higher Education Institutions. The study aims to describe and foster understanding of the beliefs, perceptions, and felt constraints of ten academic researchers deeply involved in digital scholarship. Academic research, as one of the four categories of scholarship, is the focus of the analysis. The methods of data collection included in-depth online interviews, field notes, closed blog posts, and follow up dialogues via email and web-telephony.
The literature review within this study presents a narrative on scholarship throughout the ages up to the current environment, highlighting the role of technology in assisting different forms of networking, communication, and dissemination of knowledge. It covers aspects of online participation and scholarship such as the open access movement, online networks and communities of practice that ultimately influence academic researchers’ sense of identity and their approaches to digital scholarship. The themes explored in the literature review had a crucial role in informing the interview guide that supported the narrative accounts of the research participants. However, the data collected uncovered a gap in knowledge not anticipated in the literature review, that of power relations between the individual and their institutions. Hence, an additional sociological research lens, that of Pierre Bourdieu, was adopted in order to complete the analysis of the data collected. There were three major stages of analysis: the construction of research narratives as a first pass analysis of the narrative inquiry, a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts, and a Bourdieuian analysis, supported by additional literature, that reveals the complexity of current academic practice in the context of the Participatory Web.
This research set out to study the online practices of academic researchers in a changing environment and ended up examining the conflicts between modern and conservative approaches to research scholarship in the context of academic researchers’ practices. This study argues that the Participatory Web, in the context of academic research, can not only empower academic researchers but also place them in contention with traditional and persistent scholarly practice.
Von Cristina Costa in der Dissertation The participatory web in the context of academic research (2013) The literature review within this study presents a narrative on scholarship throughout the ages up to the current environment, highlighting the role of technology in assisting different forms of networking, communication, and dissemination of knowledge. It covers aspects of online participation and scholarship such as the open access movement, online networks and communities of practice that ultimately influence academic researchers’ sense of identity and their approaches to digital scholarship. The themes explored in the literature review had a crucial role in informing the interview guide that supported the narrative accounts of the research participants. However, the data collected uncovered a gap in knowledge not anticipated in the literature review, that of power relations between the individual and their institutions. Hence, an additional sociological research lens, that of Pierre Bourdieu, was adopted in order to complete the analysis of the data collected. There were three major stages of analysis: the construction of research narratives as a first pass analysis of the narrative inquiry, a thematic analysis of the interview transcripts, and a Bourdieuian analysis, supported by additional literature, that reveals the complexity of current academic practice in the context of the Participatory Web.
This research set out to study the online practices of academic researchers in a changing environment and ended up examining the conflicts between modern and conservative approaches to research scholarship in the context of academic researchers’ practices. This study argues that the Participatory Web, in the context of academic research, can not only empower academic researchers but also place them in contention with traditional and persistent scholarly practice.
Diese Doktorarbeit erwähnt ...
Personen KB IB clear | Richard P. Adler , Terry Anderson , Marzieh Asgari-Targhi , Daniel E. Atkins , Albert Bandura , Curtis J. Bonk , John Seely Brown , Jerome S. Bruner , Vannevar Bush , Manuel Castells , Katie Clinton , Marianne Coleman , Emory M. Craig , Jay Cross , John Dewey , Elizabeth Eisenstein , Derek Glover , Mark Granovetter , Allen L. Hammond , Rudy Hirschheim , Henry Jenkins , Heinz K. Klein , Mark J.W. Lee , Amanda Lenhart , Lawrence Lessig , Catherine McLoughlin , John Naughton , Zizi Papacharissi , Meik Poschen , Neil Postman , Rob Procter , Kristen Purcell , Ravi Purushotma , Alice J. Robison , Clay Shirky , Aaron Smith , John D. Smith , Helene Snee , Robert Spector , James Stewart , James Surowiecki , Don Tapscott , Michael Thomas , Alex Voss , Margaret Weigel , Martin Weller , Etienne Wenger , Nancy White , Anthony D. Williams , Robin Williams , Kathryn Zickuhr | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Aussagen KB IB clear | ICT beeinflusst Wissenschaft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Begriffe KB IB clear | AwarenessAwareness , ContentContent , Denkenthinking , Digitalisierung , Dilemma , Epistemologie (Erkenntnistheorie)epistemology , Ethikethics , Evaluationevaluation , Hochschulehigher education institution , Kommunikationcommunication , Komplexitätcomplexity , Kontextcontext , Open AccessOpen Access , Paradigmaparadigm , Vertraulichkeit /confidentialityconfidentiality , WWW (World Wide Web)World Wide Web | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bücher |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Texte |
|
Diese Doktorarbeit erwähnt vermutlich nicht ...
Nicht erwähnte Begriffe | Integrität / integrity, Universität, Verfügbarkeit / availability |
Zitationsgraph
Zeitleiste
1 Erwähnungen
- 25 Years of Ed Tech (Martin Weller) (2020)
Volltext dieses Dokuments
The participatory web in the context of academic research: Gesamtes Buch als Volltext (: , 3017 kByte; : Link unterbrochen? Letzte Überprüfung: 2020-11-28 Letzte erfolgreiche Überprüfung: 2019-02-28) |
Anderswo suchen
Beat und diese Dissertation
Beat hat diese Dissertation während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. Eine digitale Version ist auf dem Internet verfügbar (s.o.). Es gibt bisher nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.