Pair programming in educationa literature review
Publikationsdatum:
Zu finden in: Computer Science Education 2/2011 (Seite 135 bis 173), 2011
|
|
Diese Seite wurde seit 1 Jahr inhaltlich nicht mehr aktualisiert.
Unter Umständen ist sie nicht mehr aktuell.
Zusammenfassungen
This article provides a review of the pair programming research literature and is focused on the study of pair programming in the undergraduate curriculum. A majority of these studies focus on
introductory programming, although research on pair programming in upper-level and graduate courses, and some from industry as it relates to education, is also reported. Section 2 summarizes research findings about the benefits of pair programming in higher education. Section 3 addresses the challenges of scheduling and partner compatibility, and the transition to solo programming. Section 4 addresses the practical matters of introducing paired programming in classroom settings. Section 5 closes with a summary of open research questions. In the appendix, a table maps papers to the sections where they are discussed.
Von Brian Hanks, Sue Fitzgerald, Renée McCauley, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Journal Computer Science Education 2/2011 im Text Pair programming in education (2011) This article provides a review of educational research literature focusedon pair programming in the undergraduate computer science curricu-lum. Research suggests that the benefits of pair programming includeincreased success rates in introductory courses, increased retention in themajor, higher quality software, higher student confidence in solutions,and improvement in learning outcomes. Moreover, there is someevidence that women, in particular, benefit from pair programming. Theliterature also provides evidence that the transition from paired to soloprogramming is easy for students. The greatest challenges for pairedstudents appear to concern scheduling and partner compatibility. Thisreview also considers practical issues such as assigning partners,teaching students to work in pairs, and assessing individual contribu-tions, and concludes with a discussion of open research questions.
Von Brian Hanks, Sue Fitzgerald, Renée McCauley, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Journal Computer Science Education 2/2011 im Text Pair programming in education (2011) This article provides a review of educational research literature focused on pair programming in the undergraduate computer science curriculum. Research suggests that the benefits of pair programming include increased success rates in introductory courses, increased retention in the major, higher quality software, higher student confidence in solutions, and improvement in learning outcomes. Moreover, there is some evidence that women, in particular, benefit from pair programming. The literature also provides evidence that the transition from paired to solo programming is easy for students. The greatest challenges for paired students appear to concern scheduling and partner compatibility. This review also considers practical issues such as assigning partners, teaching students to work in pairs, and assessing individual contributions, and concludes with a discussion of open research questions.
Von Brian Hanks, Sue Fitzgerald, Renée McCauley, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Journal Computer Science Education 2/2011 im Text Pair programming in education (2011) This article provides a review of educational research literature focused
on pair programming in the undergraduate computer science curriculum.
Research suggests that the benefits of pair programming include
increased success rates in introductory courses, increased retention in the
major, higher quality software, higher student confidence in solutions,
and improvement in learning outcomes. Moreover, there is some
evidence that women, in particular, benefit from pair programming. The
literature also provides evidence that the transition from paired to solo
programming is easy for students. The greatest challenges for paired
students appear to concern scheduling and partner compatibility. This
review also considers practical issues such as assigning partners,
teaching students to work in pairs, and assessing individual contributions,
and concludes with a discussion of open research questions.
Von Brian Hanks, Sue Fitzgerald, Renée McCauley, Laurie Murphy, Carol Zander im Journal Computer Science Education 2/2011 im Text Pair programming in education (2011) Dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel erwähnt ...
Dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel erwähnt vermutlich nicht ...
Nicht erwähnte Begriffe | Digitalisierung, Informatik-Didaktik, Informatikunterricht in der Schule, Kinder, LehrerIn, Schule |
Tagcloud
Zitationsgraph
Zeitleiste
3 Erwähnungen
- ICER 2015 - Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2015, Omaha, NE, USA, August 09 - 13, (Brian Dorn, Judy Sheard, Quintin I. Cutts) (2015)
- How Equity and Inequity Can Emerge in Pair Programming (Colleen M. Lewis, Niral Shah) (2015)
- ICER 2020 - International Computing Education Research Conference, Virtual Event, New Zealand, August 10-12, 2020 (Anthony V. Robins, Adon Moskal, Amy J. Ko, Renée McCauley) (2020)
- A Longitudinal Evaluation of a Best Practices CS1 (Adrian Salguero, Julian J. McAuley, Beth Simon, Leo Porter 0001) (2020)
- Fachliche Bildung in der digitalen Welt - Digitalisierung, Big Data und KI im Forschungsfokus von 15 Fachdidaktiken (Volker Frederking, Ralf Romeike) (2022)
- Informatische Bildung in der digitalen Welt - Die digitale Transformation im Fokus der Informatikdidaktik ± Theorie, Empirie, Praxis (Ralf Romeike, Stefan Seegerer)
Anderswo finden
Volltext dieses Dokuments
Pair programming in education: Artikel als Volltext (: , 215 kByte; : 2021-03-21) |
Anderswo suchen
Beat und dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel
Beat hat Dieser wissenschaftliche Zeitschriftenartikel während seiner Zeit am Institut für Medien und Schule (IMS) ins Biblionetz aufgenommen. Beat besitzt kein physisches, aber ein digitales Exemplar. Eine digitale Version ist auf dem Internet verfügbar (s.o.). Es gibt bisher nur wenige Objekte im Biblionetz, die dieses Werk zitieren.