Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment
Thomas W. Price, Tiffany Barnes
Zu finden in: ICER 2015 (Seite 91 bis 99), 2015
This study supports the claim that block programming interfaces can significantly improve novice performance on some programming activities, specifically through increased time on task and quicker, more frequent achievement of programming goals. The study suggests that the block interface is an important component of BBPEs, which is worthy of future study and development.Von Thomas W. Price, Tiffany Barnes im Konferenz-Band ICER 2015 im Text Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment (2015)
Visual, block-based programming environments present an alternative way of teaching programming to novices and have proven successful in classrooms and informal learning settings. However, few studies have been able to attribute this success to specific features of the environment. In this study, we isolate the most fundamental feature of these environments, the block interface, and compare it directly to ist textual counterpart. We present analysis from a study of two groups of novice programmers, one assigned to each interface, as they completed a simple programming activity. We found that while the interface did not seem to affect users' attitudes or perceived difficulty, students using the block interface spent less time off task and completed more of the activity's goals in less time.Von Thomas W. Price, Tiffany Barnes im Konferenz-Band ICER 2015 im Text Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment (2015)
This study seeks to isolate the effects of a block interface on the experience of novices when learning to program. To do this, we created two instances of a programming environment, differing only in that one uses a textual programming interface, and one uses a block interface. We collected data from novice, middle-school programmers as they used one of the two interfaces, and analyzed it to answer the following research questions. When compared to a textual interface, how will a block interface:Von Thomas W. Price, Tiffany Barnes im Konferenz-Band ICER 2015 im Text Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment (2015)
- RQ1. Affect students' attitudes towards computing?
- RQ2. Affect their perceived diculty of programming?
- RQ3. Affect their performance on a programming activity?
Dieses Konferenz-Paper erwähnt ...
KB IB clear
|Michal Armoni, Mordechai Ben-Ari, Karen Brennan, Evelyn Eastmond, Mark Guzdial, Yasmin B. Kafai, Caitlin Kelleher, Colleen M. Lewis, John Maloney, Orni Meerbaum-Salant, Amon Millner, Andrés Monroy-Hernández, Seymour Papert, Randy Pausch, Mitchel Resnick, Eric Rosenbaum, Natalie Rusk, Jay Silver, Brian Silverman|
KB IB clear
|Blockbasierte Sprachen erleichtern den Einstieg ins Programmierenblock programming interfaces improve novice programming performance|
Programmieren ist schwierig
KB IB clear
|blockbasierte Programmiersprachenvisual programming language, formal learningformal learning, informal learninginformal learning, Lernenlearning, Programmierenprogramming, Programmiersprachenprogramming languages|
- Modality matters - Understanding the Effects of Programming Language Representation in High School Computer Science Classrooms (David Weintrop) (2016)
- SIGCSE 2017 - Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Seattle, WA, USA, March 8-11, 2017 (Michael E. Caspersen, Stephen H. Edwards, Tiffany Barnes, Daniel D. Garcia) (2017)
- ICLS 2018 1/3 (2018)
- Impacts of Block-based Programming on Young Learners’ Programming Skills and Attitudes in the Context of Smart Environments (Mazyar Seraj) (2020)
Volltext dieses Dokuments
|Comparing Textual and Block Interfaces in a Novice Programming Environment: Fulltext at the ACM Digital Library (: , 867 kByte; : Link unterbrochen? Letzte Überprüfung: 2020-07-28 Letzte erfolgreiche Überprüfung: 2020-04-28)|